Asteroids number in the millions and range from 930 km across to metre-sized. The mineral content of the bigger ones can be inferred from analysing their spectra. In the most widely used classification scheme, the bulk of the population fall into three groups. The most numerous are the C-group asteroids, some 75% of the total; they have dark surfaces and are similar in composition to carbonaceous chondrites. C-types (‘c’ for carbon) and D-types (‘d’ for dark) are subdivisions of this group. The S-group (‘s’ for stone) accounts for about 15%; they contain various silicate compounds and a certain amount of nickel and iron, and are the source of ordinary chondrites. S-types and V-types (‘v’ for Vesta) are subdivisions. The remaining 10% comprise the X-group, subdivided into M-types (‘m’ for metal), E-types (‘e’ for enstatite) and P-types (‘pseudo-M’). The spectra of the M-types suggest a predominantly iron content and thus a relationship with iron meteorites. Asteroids do not compose an orderly compositional gradient across the main belt but are jumbled together, especially the smaller ones. At sizes over 50 km S-types dominate the inner belt, C-types the middle belt, and others, chiefly M- and D-types, the outer belt.
Vesta is a rare example of a large parent body. It spawned the V-type asteroids and the ‘HED’ group of achondritic meteorites (meteorites lacking chondrules), most if not all of which can be attributed to the two enormous impact craters 500 and 400 km wide and 13 km deep near its south pole. Although its mass is 23,000 times smaller than Earth’s, Vesta was still large enough to have differentiated into mantle and core: internal melting caused light minerals (silicates) to float towards the surface and caused heavy minerals (rich in iron) to sink towards the centre. The source of the heat is unclear, for although the asteroid formed only 2–4 million years after CAIs, the heat from radioactivity seems to have been insufficient to cause large-scale melting (Kunihiro et al. 2004, Sokol et al. 2007). That Vesta is no younger than most chondrules is challenging for the nebula hypothesis. Possibly it derived from the explosion of a still larger body and was already molten at that point.
Whatever its origin, Vesta is exceptional. It is the second largest asteroid in the main belt and, being rockier than Ceres, the only one known to have differentiated. Other bodies once existed large enough to have differentiated, but these have long since perished and what remains are the products of disaggregation rather than aggregation. Some asteroids, such as Itokawa, the near-Earth S-type body visited in 2005 by Japan’s Hyabusa probe, are loosely bound ‘rubble piles’. They grew from the dust and boulders produced by the break-up of older, more coherent bodies, so that they too are not first-generation asteroids on the way to becoming planetesimals. Itokawa is 40% porous.
The 80-ton erstwhile asteroid 2008 TC3 is thought by some to have resulted from the catastrophic disintegration of a planet the size of Mercury or Mars (Bischoff et al. 2010, Nabiei et al. 2018). It exploded 37 km above the Nubian Desert in Sudan and showered the surface with a surprising assortment of meteorites. Some were a mixture of enstatite and ordinary chondrites. Some were a carbonaceous type of achondrite known as ureilite, representing mantle material. The asteroid itself was only loosely bound, so was most probably a second-generation body, comprising fine dust and aggregated fragments that were originally not closely associated.
With the minor exception of recent sample-return missions, meteorites alone give us direct access to the composition of the asteroids, so in the interests of objectivity meteorites have to be classified separately. There are two main types: those whose parents underwent heating but not melting (chondrites) and those whose parents underwent melting all the way to differentiation (achondrites, such as stony-irons, irons and the HED family). As above [section 3], chondrites are aggregations of relatively fine material that derived from one or more exploded planets. The immediate forbears of the achondrites – Vesta is the only extant example – were probably coherent masses of expelled molten material. Vesta’s differentiated structure indicates that the planet from which it originated had not differentiated, at least fully; otherwise Vesta, a smaller body than its parent, would not itself have had the wherewithal to differentiate into crust, mantle and core.
Assuming that terrestrial planets all started out with the same composition as the Earth’s, olivine-rich mantle and thin plagioclase-rich crust should make up around 85% of their volume, metal cores the other 15%. In other words, asteroids of mantle silicate composition should be 5–6 times more plentiful than those made of iron. However, they are ‘astonishingly rare’ (Haack & McCoy 2005). The problem posed by the scarcity of olivine-rich asteroids compared to the abundance of metal-rich asteroids is called ‘the great dunite shortage’ (dunite being rock composed of olivine).
The iron content of chondrites can be compared one with another by quantifying it relative to silicon, the dominant element after oxygen. The proportion varies greatly (see diagram). By far the most common group (over 90%) are the ordinary chondrites. These are characterised by abundant chondrules, relatively sparse matrix, few refractory inclusions and 1.5–8% iron. Relative to the bulk composition of Earth, most chondrites are depleted in iron
Analysis has confirmed that the olivine grains within chondrules derive from mantle material (Libourel & Krot 2007). In terms of the nebula hypothesis, ‘Chondrules are not as pristine as conventionally viewed; instead, they consist of nebular and asteroidal materials and must have postdated accretion … and [also have postdated] differentiation of some early generation planetesimals.’ If the asteroids sampled by chondrites were to be completely melted and differentiated, the resultant body would comprise a small metallic core (since they have some iron and nickel), a thick olivine-dominated mantle and a thin, predominantly basaltic crust (Greenwood et al. 2015). Thus the problem posed by the shortage of differentiated, olivine-rich asteroids is solved by recognising that olivine and other such silicates are the main ingredients of chondritic asteroids.
The recipe for a complete planet is chondrites (comprising CAIs, chondrules and matrix) + iron meteorites. The academic debate over which of the chondrite groups contributed to Earth’s bulk composition is misconceived. Collectively, chondrites derive from the same starting material from which every rocky planet was made. Achondrites lack chondrules because they are the cooled remains of igneous rock, for example basalt, but one cannot assume that the rock before it melted contained chondrules. The achondrites that derive from Vesta are just as old as most chondrules. So are the ureilites, dated to 4566.7 ± 1.5 Ma (Zhu et al. 2020). Various other achondrites date between 4566.5 ± 0.20 Ma and 4565.47 ± 0.20 Ma (Baker et al. 2005, Wadhwa et al. 2009, Reger et al. 2023). Polymict ureilites are thought to represent material from the daughter bodies that reassembled after the catastrophic disruption of the parent ureilite body (Goodrich et al. 2015). Evidently a body large enough to have undergone at least partial differentiation existed at the same time as chondrules were forming.
Ages can be expected to vary somewhat, since isotope dating dates the point at which a mineral cools and crystallises to become a closed system, and both cooling rates and crystallisation rates vary. A km-sized lump of molten iron will take longer to cool than a mm-sized chondrule. That aside, tungsten isotope data suggest that metal-silicate differentiation in the parents of iron meteorites occurred ‘extremely early’, within 0.3–3.0 Ma of CAI formation and about the same time as chondrules (Schersten et al. 2006, Qin et al. 2008, Burckhardt et al. 2008, Connelly et al. 2019). The different ages within the 0.3–3.0 Ma bracket reflect distinct degrees of melting and melt segregation within a single body, with Fe-FeS melt forming at ~1000° C and pure Fe melt forming at ~1700° C (Kruijer et al. 2014). As with other achondrites, that irons should have formed this early is surprising, since they originated from the cores of differentiated bodies, whereas CAIs and chondrules were supposedly primitive. Once the rocky mantle was stripped away, cooling was rapid. Almost all the iron core remnants examined in one study had been exposed simultaneously, and within 7.8–11.7 Ma of CAI formation (Hunt et al. 2022).
Another major issue concerns the size and nature of the bodies from which the iron meteorites derived. Were the meteorites chipped off predominantly metallic bodies or from bodies that had a large mantle round their cores? The former seems more likely, since cooling rates are incompatible with a core insulated by a thick mantle. The parents must have been ‘much larger than previously inferred and cooled with little or no mantle’ (Yang et al. 2007, 2008). Most of the research has been on irons of the IVA variety, but the findings apply equally to other meteorites. The preferred scenario involves protoplanets the size of the Moon or larger being stripped of their mantle in collisions:
If the initial mass [of the asteroid belt] was ~103 times higher [than now] and many Moon-sized or larger protoplanets were present, collision rates would have been greatly enhanced while the differentiated bodies were still hot. As mantles are not efficiently stripped from cores by catastrophic impacts between asteroid-sized bodies, the IVA metallic body may have formed as a result of a grazing collision between protoplanets that disrupted the core of a Moon-sized body creating a string of metal-rich bodies.
The scenario of collisions leaving strings of metal-rich bodies is as elaborated by Asphaug et al., quoted at the beginning of this series. Colliding protoplanets do not simply merge. In some cases the result can be explosive, especially for the smaller body. As one author put it in the press release:
“As two massive objects pass near each other, gravitational forces induce dramatic physical changes – decompressing, melting, stripping material away, and even annihilating the smaller object” Williams says. “You can do a lot of physics and chemistry on objects in the Solar System without even touching them.” …
A planet exerts enormous pressure on itself through self-gravity, but the gravitational pull of a larger object passing close by can cause that pressure to drop precipitously. The effects of this depressurization can be explosive, Williams says. “It’s like uncorking the world’s most carbonated beverage. What happens when a planet gets decompressed by 50% is something we don’t understand very well, but it can shift the chemistry and physics all over the place, producing a complexity of materials that could very well account for the heterogeneity we see in meteorites.”
No longer the stuff of fringe speculation, exploding planets have entered the mainstream. ‘Chondrites do not represent the precursor material from which asteroids accreted and then differentiated’; instead they ‘derive from asteroids that accreted late … [possibly] by re-accretion of debris produced during collisional disruption of older asteroids’ (Kleine et al. 2005). ‘Group IVA iron and silicate-iron meteorites record … an impact-related disruption of a molten and differentiated ca. 1000 km diameter planetary embryo’ (Connelly et al. 2019). One problem with interpreting chondrules as the products of brief catastrophic events is that chondrules from the same chondrite group can yield ages spread over at least 3 Ma (Connelly et al. 2012). The scenario intrinsically implies a shorter timescale, as if the conventional dating inflated true time.
Explosions no longer being outlawed, the starting scenario could equally be a single large planet exploding to produce many globes of molten iron from its core. The high abundance of iron meteorites supports the idea. The maximum size of the original metal-rich body or bodies is not well constrained, and estimates have increased over the years. The conclusion that the ureilites of 2008 TC3 (the asteroid that disintegrated above the Nubian Desert) came from a parent somewhere between Mercury and Mars in size is based on diamonds in them that could only have formed under pressures above 20 GPa, equivalent to the pressure at the centre of Mercury and the core-mantle boundary of Mars (Nabiei et al. 2018). However, 20 GPa is the minimum required, and ureilites are mantle rocks. If the diamonds originated in the middle or upper mantle and the pressure was already 20 GPa there, the planet could have been considerably bigger than Mars. In the context of the solar nebula, it is difficult to postulate vanished bodies even the size of Mars, let alone planets bigger than Earth.
